翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ City of Edinburgh Basketball Club ・ City of Edinburgh Council election, 1995 ・ City of Edinburgh Council election, 1999 ・ City of Edinburgh Council election, 2003 ・ City of Edinburgh Council election, 2007 ・ City of Edinburgh Council election, 2012 ・ City of Edinburgh District Council election, 1974 ・ City of Edinburgh District Council election, 1977 ・ City of Edinburgh District Council election, 1980 ・ City of Edinburgh District Council election, 1984 ・ City of Edinburgh District Council election, 1988 ・ City of Edinburgh Kings ・ City of Edinburgh Music School ・ City of Edinburgh Racing Club ・ City of Elizabeth ・ City of Elizabeth v. American Nicholson Pavement Co. ・ City of Ely Council ・ City of Ember ・ City of Erie v. Pap's A. M. ・ City of Essendon ・ City of Evil ・ City of Eyes ・ City of Fairfax Historic District ・ City of Fairfield ・ City of Faith Church ・ City of Fallen Angels ・ City of Fathers ・ City of Fear ・ City of Fear (film) ・ City of federal subject significance Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク City of Elizabeth v. American Nicholson Pavement Co. ： ウィキペディア英語版 City of Elizabeth v. American Nicholson Pavement Co. ''City of Elizabeth v. American Nicholson Pavement Co.'', 97 U.S. 126 (1878),〔(97 U.S. 126 ) Full text of the opinion courtesy of Justia.com.〕 was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that while the public use of an invention more than one year prior to the inventor's application for a patent normally causes the inventor to lose his right to a patent, there is an exception to this rule for public uses for experimental purposes. ==Facts and procedural history== Inventor Samuel Nicholson sought to patent a process for Nicolson pavement, a system of pavement using wooden blocks. In his lawsuit, he alleged that the City of Elizabeth, New Jersey, George W. Tubbs, and the New Jersey Wood-Paving Co. had infringed on his patent. Nicholson was testing his new process publicly at the time of the suit. The defendants alleged that Nicholson's patent was invalid because the invention lacked novelty, and that he had been publicly using the system for the previous six years, thus constituting an abandonment of his right to a patent under the "On-sale bar". The lower court found for Nicholson, and the defendants appealed. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「City of Elizabeth v. American Nicholson Pavement Co.」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.